An impossibility theorem for paired comparisons

نویسنده

  • László Csató
چکیده

In several decision-making problems, alternatives should be ranked on the basis of paired comparisons between them. We present an axiomatic approach for the universal ranking problem with arbitrary preference intensities, incomplete and multiple comparisons. In particular, two basic properties – independence of irrelevant matches and self-consistency – are considered. It is revealed that there exists no ranking method satisfying both requirements at the same time. The impossibility result holds under various restrictions on the set of ranking problems, however, it does not emerge in the case of round-robin tournaments. An interesting and more general possibility result is obtained by restricting the domain of independence of irrelevant matches through the concept of macrovertex. JEL classification number: C44, D71 AMS classification number: 15A06, 91B14

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Arrow theorems in the fuzzy setting

Throughout this paper, our  main idea is to analyze the Arrovian approach in a fuzzy context, paying attention to different extensions of the classical Arrow's model arising in mathematical Social Choice to aggregate preferences that the agents define on a set of alternatives. There is a wide set of extensions. Some of them give rise to an impossibility theorem as in the Arrovian classical  mod...

متن کامل

The Hex Game Theorem and the Arrow Impossibility Theorem: the Case of Weak Orders

The Arrow impossibility theorem when individual preferences are weak orders is equivalent to the HEX game theorem. Because Gale showed that the Brouwer fixed point theorem is equivalent to the HEX game theorem, this paper indirectly shows the equivalence of the Brouwer fixed point theorem and the Arrow impossibility theorem. Chichilnisky showed the equivalence of her impossibility theorem and t...

متن کامل

22 Interpersonally Comparable Utility

This chapter supplements the earlier reviews in Hammond (1991a) and Suzumura (1996) by concentrating on four issues. The first is that in welfare economics interpersonal comparisons are only needed to go beyond Pareto efficiency or Pareto improvements. The second concerns the need for interpersonal comparisons in social choice theory, to escape Arrow’s impossibility theorem. The third issue is ...

متن کامل

Preference Strength and Two Kinds of Ordinalism*

In his paper "Extended Sympathy and the Possibility of Social Choice", Professor Arrow first considers an approach to individual utilities which is "strictly ordinal" and rules out interpersonal comparisons. This is the approach he took when he formulated his original impossibility theorem [1]. He then takes up an approach which allows interperso~al comparisons, but only of an ordinal kind. The...

متن کامل

An impossibility theorem for amalgamating evidence

Amalgamating evidence of different kinds for the same hypothesis into an overall confirmation is analogous, I argue, to amalgamating individuals’ preferences into a group preference. The latter faces well-known impossibility theorems, most famously “Arrow’s Theorem”. Once the analogy between amalgamating evidence and amalgamating preferences is tight, it is obvious that amalgamating evidence mi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • CoRR

دوره abs/1612.00186  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2016